Typically the most heinous crimes, or the cases with which it is easiest to identify with the victims, incur the loudest cries for the death penalty. Subsequent anger and outrage is projected often with little regard for the truth. Atrocious crimes should incur harsh penalties, but, institutionally, reason has to prevail over blood lust.
With regard to public policy making, you cannot differentiate between clear instances of guilt and flimsy guilty verdicts. A jury of "peers" distinguishes guilt from innocence. An added layer of discretion would only further separate this system from a remotely consistent path to the truth or justice. Policy makers who preach the desirability of executions as a deterrent address their own inability to understand and address the underlying causes of violent crime.
- Only the United States of all the western industrialized nations engages in this punishment.
- State-authorized killings is immoral contradicts the morality it seeks to uphold. It epitomizes the tragic triumph of violence over reason.
- Capital punishment is always irrevocable - forever depriving an convicted of the opportunity to benefit from new evidence that could overturn a conviction.
- The death penalty violates the constitutional guarantee of equal protection under the law. It is applied randomly, discriminatorily, and panders to the public's potentially flawed reception to the crime in question.
No comments:
Post a Comment